Barriers and Problems of using new technologies for development of recreational sports

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Department of Sport Management, Faculty of Humans Science, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran

2 department of physical education, Faculty of humanities, Tarbiat Mdares University

3 Assistant Professor of Sport Management, Tarbiat Modares University

4 Professor of Sport Management, Tarbiat Modares University

Abstract

Objective: The purpose of the present study is to identify Barriers and Problems of using new technologies for development of recreational sports.
Methodology: The data were collected through semi-structured interviews using a qualitative method. For data analysis, thematic analysis method (Brown and Clark, 2006) was used.
Results: The study results showed that challenges of using new technologies for development of recreational sports are divided into five groups: 1) lack of independence of decision-making institutions, 2) fragmentation of decisions, 3) technology use ease, 4) traditional view and basic understanding of the new era of recreational sports among officials and 5) unacceptable context.
Conclusion: According to the study results, the three themes of lack of independence of decision-making institutions, fragmentation of decision-making and traditional view and basic understanding of the new era of recreational sports among officials are among the most important challenges that lead to technology use ease in sports and especially recreational sports. On the other hand, unacceptable context includes themes, each of which individually poses a challenge for development of recreational sports through new technologies.

Keywords

Main Subjects


  • فرهادی، هادی؛ بخشایی، ریحانه؛ رشیدی، ریحانه. (1395). «اختلال اعتیاد به بازی‌های رایانه‌ای: بررسی میزان شیوع و ارتباط آن با متغیرهای جمعیت‌شناختی». دومین کنفرانس ملی بازی‌های رایانه‌ای؛ فرصت‌ها و چالش‌ها. اصفهان: دانشگاه اصفهان.
  • قاسمی، علی. (1393). «عمده چالش‌های انتقال فناوری و تکنولوژی در ایران». چهارمین کنفرانس بین‌المللی و هشتمین کنفرانس ملی مدیریت فناوری. کیش: انجمن مدیریت فناوری ایران.

 

  • Almeida, M. D. & Neiva, H. (2018). The Use of Technology in Sport: Emerging Challenges. IntechOpen Press.
  • Amiri, M., & Norouzi Seyed Hossini, R. (2013). An introduction on qualitative research method in sport. Tehran: University of Tehran Publication.
  • Andrew, D. P.; Pedersen, P. M. & McEvoy, C. D. (2011). Research Methods and Design in Sport Management. Human Kinetics Publishers.
  • Braun, V. & Clarke, V. (2006). “Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology”. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101.
  • Cabrilo, S. & Dahms, S. (2018). “How Strategic Knowledge Management Drives Intellectual Capital to Superior Innovation and Market Performance”. Journal of Knowledge Management, 22(3), 621-648.
  • Carr K, Smith K, Weir P, Horton S. (2018). “Sport, Physical Activity, and Aging: Are We on the Right Track?” In Sport and Physical Activity Across the Lifespan. London, Palgrave Macmillan 317-346.
  • Coenen, P.; Korshoj, M.; Hallman, D, M.; Huysmans, M, A.; Van der Beek, A, J.; Straker, L, M. & Holtermann, A. (2018). “Differences in Heart Rate Reserve of Similar Physical Activities During Work and in Leisure Time, A Study Among Danish Bluecollar Workers”. Physiology & Behavior, 186, 45-51.
  • Ferreira, J. J.; Fernandes, C.; Ratten, V. & Miragaia, D. (2020). “Sports Innovation: A Bibliometric Study”. In Sport Entrepreneurship and Public Policy. Springer: 153–170.
  • Gür, F.;Can Gur,G. & Ayan, V. (2020). “The Effect of the ERVE Smartphone App on Physical Activity, Quality of Life, Self-Efficacy, and Exercise Motivation for Inactive People: A Randomized Controlled Trial”. European Journal of Integrative Medicine, 39, 101198.
  • Hossini, R. N. S., Ehsani, M., Kozechian, H., & Amiri, M. (2014). Review of the concept of human capital in sports with an emphasis on capability approach. American Journal of Social Sciences2(6), 145-151.
  • Kim, D. & Ko, Y. J. (2019). “The Impact of Virtual Reality (VR) Technology on Sport Spectators’ Flow Experience and Satisfaction”. Computers in Human Behavior, 93, 346-356.
  • Kim, T.; Chiu, W. & Chow, K. (2019). “Sport Technology Consumers: Segmenting Users of Sports Wearable Devices Based on Technology Readiness”. Sport Business and Management, 9(2), 134-145.
  • Kruszynska, E. & Poczta.; J. (2019). “Hierarchy of Factors Affecting the Condition and Development of Sports and Recreation Infrastructure - Impact on the Recreational Activity and Health of the Residents of a City (Poznan Case Study)”. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(4), 556.
  • Mallen, C. (2019). Emerging Technologies in Sport: Implications for Sport Management. Routledge.
  • Miragaia, D. A. M.; da Costa, C. D. & Ratten, V. (2018). “Sport Events at the Community Level: A Pedagogical Tool to Improve Skills for Students and Teachers”. Education and Training, 60(5), 431-442.
  • Qian, H. (2018). “Knowledge-based Regional Economic Development: A Synthetic Review of Knowledge Spillovers, Entrepreneurship and Entrepreneurial Ecosystems”. Economic Development Quarterly, 32(2), 163-176.
  • Ratten, V. (2020). “Sport Technology: A Commentary”. Journal of High Technology Management Research, 31(1), 41-61.
  • Sierra, J. J. & Taute, H. A. (2019). “Brand Tribalism in Technology and Sport: Determinants and Outcomes”. Journal of Brand Management, 26(2), 209-225.
  • Svensson, P. G.; Hambrick. M. E. (2018). “Exploring How External Stakeholders Shape Social Innovation in Sport for Development and Peace”. Sport Management Review, 22(4), 540-552.
  • Szymanski, M.; Wolfe, R.; Danis, W.; Lee, F. & Vy, M. (2020). “Sport and International Management: Exploring Research Synergy”. Thunderbird International Business Review, 54(5), 87-101.
  • Zeimers, G.; Anagnostopoulos, C.; Zintz, T. & Willem, A. (2019). “Organisational Learning for Corporate Social Responsibility in Sport Organisations”. European Sport Management Quarterly, 19(1), 80-101.
  • Zumarova, M. (2015). “Computers and Childrens Leisure Time”. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 176, 779-786.