Validation of the Human Resources Performance Evaluation Model of the Ministry of Sports and Youth

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Phd Student in Sport Management, Tehran North Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.

2 Associate Professor in Sport Management, Physical Education and Sport Science Department, Allameh Tabataba'i University, Tehran, Iran.

3 Professor in Sport Management, Sciences and Researches Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.

4 Professor in Sport Management, Physical Education and Sport Science Department, Payame Noor University, Tehran, Iran.

10.22084/smms.2024.25628.3002

Abstract

The purpose of this research was to validate the human resources performance evaluation model of the Ministry of Sports and Youth. The method of this research was hybrid and its design was of harmonization type. In the qualitative part, the grounded theory method was used and in the quantitative part, the descriptive-survey method was used. The participants of this research were in the qualitative part of the experts of sports organizations and university professors and in the quantitative part of the staff of the Ministry of Sports and Youth. In the qualitative part, the sampling method was purposeful and 14 people were selected based on theoretical saturation. In terms of quality, the random sampling method was simple and the sample size with the help of SPSS Sample Power software version 3 was 330 people. To analyze the information of the qualitative part, open, axial and selective coding methods were used, and in the quantitative part, the structural equation modeling method was used. According to the findings of this study, 85 concepts and 21 sub-categories were counted in the qualitative section, which were classified into causal, contextual, intervening, strategic, and consequences. Also, based on quantitative findings, it was determined that the human resources performance evaluation model in the Ministry of Sports and Youth has the necessary credibility. Based on the research findings, if the performance of human resources in the Ministry of Sports and Youth is evaluated, the improvement of administrative functions and implementation of this ministry, the development of its performance and finally the satisfaction of its clients will take place.

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

  •  اسدی، حسن؛ قنبرپور نصرتی، امیر؛ حسین قربانی، محمدحسین؛ دوستی، مرتضی (1388). «رابطه بین یادگیری و عملکرد سازمانی در کارشناسان سازمان تربیت­بدنی»، مدیریت ورزشی، (1): 247-237.
  •  اسدی، فریده؛ مظفری، سید امیراحمد؛ زارعی، علی (1396). «رابطه مدیریت منابع انسانی با عملکرد سازمانی از دیدگاه کارشناسان ستادی وزارت ورزش و جوانان ایران»، پژوهش‌های معاصر در مدیریت ورزشی، 7(13): 30-23.
  •  اسکندری دستگیری، سیمین؛ امیرتاش، علی‌محمد؛ صفانیا، علی‌محمد (1396). «ارزیابی عملکرد منتخبی از فدراسیون‌های ورزشی ایران با استفاده از تحلیل پوششی داده­ها با رویکرد به سیستم­های فازی»، رویکردهای نوین در مدیریت ورزشی، 5(9): 36-23.
  •  خلیل­نژاد، شهرام؛ گل­محمدی، عماد؛ نیستانی، سمیه؛ رسوله­وندی، محمد باقر (1397). «نقش میانجی یادگیری سازمانی در تأثیر اقدامات استراتژیک منابع انسانی بر عملکرد سازمانی»، مطالعات منابع انسانی، 8(1): 42-25.
  •  سراجی، مهدیه؛ حسینی، سیدعماد؛ احسانی، محمد؛ برومند، محمدرضا (1395). «ارزیابی و بهینه‌سازی عملکرد فدراسیون‌های ورزشی منتخب جمهوری اسلامی ایران با استفاده از روش تحلیل پوششی داده­ها»، مطالعات راهبردی ورزش و جوانان، 15(33): 19-1.
  •  شکری املشی، شمسی (1399). طراحی مدل مدیریت مسیر شغلی مربیان ورزشی ایران، رساله دکتری، مدیریت ورزشی، دانشکده تربیت­بدنی و علوم ورزشی، دانشگاه خوارزمی.
  •  میراحمدی، خالد؛ خراسانی، اباصلت؛ نظرپور، محمدتقی؛ شمس مورکانی، غلامرضا (1401). «سنتزپژوهی آسیب‌های نظام ارزیابی عملکرد منابع انسانی ایران: طراحی یک الگو»، پژوهش­های مدیریت منابع انسانی، 14(1): 15-1.
  •  میرفخرالدینی، حیدر؛ پیمان­فر، محمدحسن؛ خطیبی عقدا، عبدالنبی؛ علیمحمدی، حسین (1392). «ارزیابی عملکرد سازمان­های ورزشی با استفاده از مدل منسجم BSC - TOPSIS (مطالعه موردی: اداره کل تربیت بدنی استان یزد)»، نشریه مدیریت ورزشی، 5(16): 96-77.
  •  وطن­خواه، سودابه؛ محمدی، علیرضا؛ عشرتی، بابک (1401). «رابطه بین ارزیابی عملکرد و گرایش به کارآفرینی سازمانی در کارکنان منتخب معاونت بهداشتی دانشگاه علوم پزشکی ایران»، فصلنامه مدیریت سلامت، 24(1): 42-34.
  • Adhikara, M. A., Diana, N., & Basjir, M. (2022). “Organizational Performance in Environmental Uncertainty on the Indonesian Healthcare Industry: A Path Analysis”. Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, 11(2): 365-373.
  • Armstrong, M. (2021). Performance management, an evidence- based guide to delivering high performance. London and Philadelphia.
  • Azizi, B. (2017). “The study of relationship between organizational learning and organizational performance”. Revista Administração em Diálogo, 19(1): 164-172.
  • Berman, E. M., Bowman, J. S., West, J. P., & Van Wart, M. R. (2015). Human resource management in public service: Paradoxes, processes, and problems. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Bernardin, H. J., & Russell, J. E. (2006). Human resource management. Tata McGraw-Hill.
  • Boonie, G.M. (2012). “Performance apprised systems productivity and montirntion study”, Public personel management, 31(2): 141-160.
  • Bovens, M. (2010). “Two Concepts of Accountability: Accountability as a Virtue and as a Mechanism”. West European Politics, 33(5): 946-967.
  • Creswell, J. W., & Clark, V. L. P. (2017). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Sage publications.
  • De Lancer Julnes, P. (2006). “Performance measurement: An effective tool for government accountability?”, The debate goes on. Evaluation, 12(2): 219-235.
  • DeVaro, J., Li, R., & Brookshire, D. (2007). “Analyzing the job characteristics model: New support from a cross-section of establishments”. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 18(6): 986-1003.
  • Dusterhoff, C., Cunningham, J. B., & MacGregor, J. N. (2014). “The effects of performance rating, leader–member exchange, perceived utility, and organizational justice on performance appraisal satisfaction: Applying a moral judgment perspective”. Journal of business ethics, 119(2): 265-273.
  • EL Telyani, A., Farmanesh, P., & Zargar, P. (2022). “An Examination of the Relationship Between Levels Diversity-Organizational Performance: Does Innovative Culture Matter?”. SAGE Open, 12(1): 1-15.
  • Fock, H., Chiang, F., Au, K. Y., & Hui, M. K. (2011). “The moderating effect of collectivistic orientation in psychological empowerment and job satisfaction relationship”. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 30(2): 319-328.
  • Fried, H. O., Lambrinos, J., & Tyner, J. (2004). “Evaluating the performance of professional golfers on the PGA, LPGA and SPGA tours”. European Journal of Operational Research, 154(2): 548-561.
  • Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (2017). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Routledge.
  • Han, Y., & Hong, S. (2019). “The impact of accountability on organizational performance in the US federal government: The moderating role of autonomy”. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 39(1): 3-23.
  • Hassan, S. (2016). “Impact of HRM practices on employee’s performance”. International Journal of Academic Research in Accounting, Finance and Management Sciences, 6(1): 15-22.
  • Judge, T. A., & Hurst, C. (2008). “How the rich (and happy) get richer (and happier): relationship of core self-evaluations to trajectories in attaining work success”. Journal of applied psychology, 93(4): 849.
  • C. (2000). Employee Performance Accountability Systems Cambridge. Havard University.
  • Kittinger, J. D., Walker, A. G., Cope, J. G., & Wuensch, K. L. (2020). “The relationship between core self-evaluations and affective commitment”. Journal of Behavioral and Applied Management, 11(1): 68-92.
  • Mishara, M. N. (2011). Organizational Behavior. Vikas publishing house.
  • Ng, T. W., & Feldman, D. C. (2015). “The moderating effects of age in the relationships of job autonomy to work outcomes”. Work, Aging and Retirement, 1(1): 64-78.
  • Nurhayati, T., & Pitaloka, W. D. (2022). “The role of knowledge management on learning organization capacity and job performance”. Indonesian journal of sustainability, 1(1): 73-90.
  • O'Toole Jr, L. J., & Meier, K. J. (2011). Public management: Organizations, governance, and performance. Cambridge University Press.
  • Rezania, D., Baker, R., & Nixon, A. (2019). “Exploring project managers’ accountability”. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business.
  • Saha, N., Sáha, T., Gregar, A., & Sáha, P. (2020, September). “Organizational Agility and Organizational Learning: Do They Accelerate Organizational Innovation and Competency?”. In European Conference on Innovation and Entrepreneurship (pp. 578-XXI). Academic Conferences International Limited.
  • Sipahi, S., & Donuk, B. (2011, July). Combining the AHP and VIKOR methodologies for ranking basketball teams. In Internation Symposium on the APH.
  • Siu, O.-l., Lu, J.-f., Brough, P., Lu, C.-q., Bakker, A. B., Kalliath, T. . . . Lo, D. (2010). “Role resources and work–family enrichment: The role of work engagement”. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 77(3): 470-480.
  • Snell, S. A & Bohlander, G. W. (2007). Managing Human Resources. Thomson Publishing Company.
  • Sureephong, P., Dahlan, W., Chernbumroong, S., & Tongpaeng, Y. (2020). “The Effect of Non-Monetary Rewards on Employee Performance in Massive Open Online Courses”. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 15(1): 88-102.
  • Tingo, J., & Mseti, S. (2022). “Effect of Employee Independence on Employee Performance”. International Journal of Engineering, Business and Management (IJEBM). 6(2): 1-11.
  • Triyanto, U., Hoesin, W., & Subagja, I. K. (2022). “Effect of organizational culture and leadership style on employee performance through work motivation at pt. Kereta commuter Indonesia”. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Growth Evaluation, 1(3): 1-4.
  • Tsafack, N. (2018). Accountability and Employee Performance: Case Study: Bambuiy Engineering Services & Techniques (Best) Sarl.
  • Wilton, N. (2016). An introduction to human resource management. Sage.
  • Zeng, Q. X., & Liu, H. U. (2017). “A study on strategic human resource management and sports organization performance”. DEStech Transactions on Economics, Business and Management. 1(2): 172-198.
  • Zhu, J. (2014). Quantitative models for performance evaluation and benchmarking: data envelopment analysis with spreadsheets. Springer.
Contemporary Studies On Sport Management
Volume 13, Issue 26
March 2024
Pages 173-190

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics